Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti for AI

Device pages: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Β· NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 scores 1.17x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti overall (Training 1.19x, Inference 1.17x, Compute 1.14x).

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the RTX 5080's score divided by the RTX 5070 Ti's
ScoreRatioRTX 5080RTX 5070 Ti
Overall (GT)1.17x311.78265.94
Training1.19x282.72238.00
Inference1.17x509.65435.59
Compute1.14x133.53116.71

Per Model and Precision

Sustained throughput per model and precision; ratio = RTX 5080 / RTX 5070 Ti
ModelPrecisionRatioRTX 5080RTX 5070 Ti
compute
Dense MatMulBF161.04x186.38179.29
Dense MatMulFP161.08x190.03175.85
Dense MatMulFP321.13x194.65172.66
Dense MatMulFP641.18x5.814.94
Sparse MatMulFP321.21x141.84116.94
Sparse MatMulFP641.21x105.2987.30
inference
DistilBERTFP161.09x733.41673.02
DistilBERTFP81.09x482.05441.53
DistilBERTINT81.86x455.48244.40
DistilGPT2FP161.09x572.39524.70
DistilGPT2FP81.10x336.92305.01
DistilGPT2INT81.14x343.60300.28
Flan-T5 SmallFP161.10x1018.11923.84
Flan-T5 SmallFP81.03x673.82651.99
Flan-T5 SmallINT81.25x558.02445.83
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP161.10x293.75267.79
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP81.11x148.59134.16
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT81.10x144.79131.32
MobileNetV3FP161.41x1598.291136.80
MobileNetV3INT80.87x254.00292.91
training
DistilBERTBF161.11x372.87335.92
DistilBERTFP321.05x443.76423.69
DistilGPT2BF161.08x198.02182.52
DistilGPT2FP321.05x348.25330.25
Flan-T5 SmallBF161.42x257.49180.96
Flan-T5 SmallFP321.45x424.46292.30
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF161.22x163.11133.18
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.23x152.72123.82
MobileNetV3BF161.15x229.48198.68
MobileNetV3FP321.18x356.54301.48

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 scores 0.69x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 overall (Training 0.84x, Inference 0.77x, Compute 0.36x).
Where is the difference between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on GraphGPS (Peptides) at BF16 (Training), where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 scores 1.08x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, and lowest on Sparse MatMul at FP64 (Compute), at 0.16x.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started