Native Linux

NVIDIA H200

NVIDIA · GPU · LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, recorded 2026-10-28

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA H200 ranks 4 of 48 devices overall with a GT of 1044.99 (Training 811.98, rank 4; Inference 1914.61, rank 4; Compute 480.83, rank 6); overall it scores 1.11x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 and 2.32x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Hopper architecture · 141 GB HBM3e · SXM (NVIDIA specifications)

1044.99
GT · rank #4 of 48

Where It Sits on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Rank among all 48 devices; further right is higher.

  • Overall (GT)rank 4 of 48
  • Trainingrank 4 of 48
  • Inferencerank 4 of 48
  • Computerank 6 of 48
The NVIDIA H200's score divided by the reference device's score
Compared withOverallTrainingInferenceCompute
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM31.11x1.14x1.14x0.99x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40902.32x2.42x2.90x1.31x
Nearest devices on each score, with this device's score divided by theirs
ScoreNext aboveRatioNext belowRatio
Training AMD Instinct MI350X0.99x AMD Instinct MI300X1.12x
Inference NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC0.91x NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM31.14x
Compute NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM30.99x NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation1.21x
  • Among the top quarter of the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index on Training (rank 4 of 48).
  • Among the top quarter of the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index on Inference (rank 4 of 48).
  • Among the top quarter of the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index on Compute (rank 6 of 48).

training

811.98 category score
Model Precision Sustained
MobileNetV3 FP32 602.18
MobileNetV3 BF16 263.18
Flan-T5 Small FP32 1459.48
Flan-T5 Small BF16 793.25
DistilGPT2 FP32 1358.73
DistilGPT2 BF16 736.71
DistilBERT FP32 1677.92
DistilBERT BF16 1506.93
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP32 426.96
GraphGPS (Peptides) BF16 372.84

inference

1914.61 category score
Model Precision Sustained
MobileNetV3 FP16 3178.18
MobileNetV3 INT8 1156.30
Flan-T5 Small FP16 4434.11
Flan-T5 Small INT8 1521.28
Flan-T5 Small FP8 1915.20
DistilGPT2 FP16 4070.93
DistilGPT2 INT8 1587.21
DistilGPT2 FP8 2059.57
DistilBERT FP16 2839.56
DistilBERT INT8 1155.28
DistilBERT FP8 1465.34
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP16 1381.98
GraphGPS (Peptides) INT8 674.71
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP8 730.53

compute

480.83 category score
Model Precision Sustained
Dense MatMul FP32 1018.00
Dense MatMul FP16 1257.00
Dense MatMul BF16 1311.34
Dense MatMul FP64 400.40
Sparse MatMul FP32 156.14
Sparse MatMul FP64 277.15

LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index · GT = LynxBenchAI Global Score. Every precision result is sustained throughput under a declared, bounded optimisation budget — no collapsed single number below the category level.

Compare With

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

All comparisons →

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

How fast is the NVIDIA H200 for AI workloads?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA H200 ranks 4 of 48 devices overall with a GT of 1044.99 (Training 811.98, rank 4; Inference 1914.61, rank 4; Compute 480.83, rank 6); overall it scores 1.11x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 and 2.32x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
How does the NVIDIA H200 compare with the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA H200 scores 1.11x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 overall: Training 1.14x, Inference 1.14x, Compute 0.99x.
How does the NVIDIA H200 compare with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA H200 scores 2.32x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 overall: Training 2.42x, Inference 2.90x, Compute 1.31x.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Measure your own NVIDIA H200: pip install lynxbench-ai · Install guide →

← Back to the leaderboard

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started