Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) vs Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) for AI

Device pages: Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) Β· Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) scores 2.10x the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) overall (Training 1.83x, Inference 1.96x, Compute 2.46x). The two runs used different platforms (WSL and native Linux).

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)'s score divided by the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)'s
ScoreRatioIntel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)
Overall (GT)2.10x15.827.53
Training1.83x12.246.67
Inference1.96x17.368.85
Compute2.46x21.688.82
  • Runs on the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) only: FP8 inference.

When to Choose Which

  • Choose the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) for training (1.83x the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)).
  • Choose the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) for inference (1.96x the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)).
  • Choose the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) for raw compute (2.46x the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)).

From the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index category scores, which are not raw throughput; a lead under 10% counts as level.

Per Model and Precision

LynxBenchAI score per model and precision; ratio = Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) / Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)
ModelPrecisionRatioIntel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)
compute
Dense MatMulBF161.80x4.432.46
Dense MatMulFP162.70x6.612.45
Dense MatMulFP322.73x12.554.59
Dense MatMulFP642.06x1.010.49
Sparse MatMulFP322.49x116.2546.61
Sparse MatMulFP642.03x8.544.21
inference
DistilBERTFP162.36x35.0114.83
DistilBERTFP812.44x0.200.02
DistilBERTINT82.02x21.6510.73
DistilGPT2FP162.53x40.3815.94
DistilGPT2FP810.85x0.280.03
DistilGPT2INT82.20x21.769.90
Flan-T5 SmallFP162.09x41.4919.87
Flan-T5 SmallFP8n/anot runnot run
Flan-T5 SmallINT82.01x27.8913.87
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP162.12x15.267.19
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP8n/anot run0.22
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT80.20x1.045.22
MobileNetV3FP162.15x44.1020.55
MobileNetV3INT81.93x13.066.76
training
DistilBERTBF162.15x13.526.30
DistilBERTFP322.26x27.7512.27
DistilGPT2BF161.80x8.784.88
DistilGPT2FP322.14x22.6110.57
Flan-T5 SmallBF161.88x10.955.81
Flan-T5 SmallFP322.01x21.7110.79
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF161.64x3.011.83
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.78x8.584.81
MobileNetV3BF161.60x8.885.55
MobileNetV3FP321.10x8.007.24

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT faster than the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT scores 4.82x the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) overall (Training 3.05x, Inference 7.07x, Compute 5.19x). The two runs used different platforms (native Linux and WSL).
Should I choose the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT or the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)?
Choose the Radeon RX 9060 XT for training (3.05x the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)). Choose the Radeon RX 9060 XT for inference (7.07x the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)). Choose the Radeon RX 9060 XT for raw compute (5.19x the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)). These follow the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index category scores, which are not raw throughput.
Where is the difference between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT and the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on DistilBERT at FP8 (Inference), where the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT scores 664.71x the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H), and lowest on DistilBERT at FP32 (Training), at 0.56x.
Which precisions run on only one of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT and the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, only the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT runs FP8 inference; a precision a device cannot execute scores zero.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started