WSL

Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)

Intel · GPU · LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, recorded 2026-10-16

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) ranks 37 of 44 devices overall with a GT of 15.82 (Training 12.24, rank 37; Inference 17.36, rank 37; Compute 21.68, rank 37); overall it scores 0.02x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 and 0.04x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

15.82
GT · rank #37 of 44

Where It Sits on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Rank among all 44 devices; further right is higher.

  • Overall (GT)rank 37 of 44
  • Trainingrank 37 of 44
  • Inferencerank 37 of 44
  • Computerank 37 of 44
The Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)'s score divided by the reference device's score
Compared withOverallTrainingInferenceCompute
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM30.02x0.02x0.01x0.04x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40900.04x0.04x0.03x0.06x
Nearest devices on each score, with this device's score divided by theirs
ScoreNext aboveRatioNext belowRatio
Training AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT0.33x AMD Ryzen 5 9600X1.43x
Inference NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU0.16x Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)1.96x
Compute NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50600.45x Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)2.46x
  • Did not execute: FP8 inference (scored zero).

training

12.24 category score
Model Precision Sustained
MobileNetV3 FP32 8.00
MobileNetV3 BF16 8.88
Flan-T5 Small FP32 21.71
Flan-T5 Small BF16 10.95
DistilGPT2 FP32 22.61
DistilGPT2 BF16 8.78
DistilBERT FP32 27.75
DistilBERT BF16 13.52
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP32 8.58
GraphGPS (Peptides) BF16 3.01

inference

17.36 category score
Model Precision Sustained
MobileNetV3 FP16 44.10
MobileNetV3 INT8 13.06
Flan-T5 Small FP16 41.49
Flan-T5 Small INT8 27.89
Flan-T5 Small FP8 0.00
DistilGPT2 FP16 40.38
DistilGPT2 INT8 21.76
DistilGPT2 FP8 0.28
DistilBERT FP16 35.01
DistilBERT INT8 21.65
DistilBERT FP8 0.20
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP16 15.26
GraphGPS (Peptides) INT8 1.04
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP8 0.00

compute

21.68 category score
Model Precision Sustained
Dense MatMul FP32 12.55
Dense MatMul FP16 6.61
Dense MatMul BF16 4.43
Dense MatMul FP64 1.01
Sparse MatMul FP32 116.25
Sparse MatMul FP64 8.54

LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index · GT = LynxBenchAI Global Score. Every precision result is sustained throughput under a declared, bounded optimisation budget — no collapsed single number below the category level.

Compare With

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

All comparisons →

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

How fast is the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) for AI workloads?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) ranks 37 of 44 devices overall with a GT of 15.82 (Training 12.24, rank 37; Inference 17.36, rank 37; Compute 21.68, rank 37); overall it scores 0.02x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 and 0.04x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
How does the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) compare with the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) scores 0.02x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 overall: Training 0.02x, Inference 0.01x, Compute 0.04x.
How does the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) compare with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) scores 0.04x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 overall: Training 0.04x, Inference 0.03x, Compute 0.06x.
Which precisions did the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) not run?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) did not execute FP8 inference; those results score zero rather than being left out.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Measure your own Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H): pip install lynxbench-ai · Install guide →

← Back to the leaderboard

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started